Profil penulis
FUJI
81 karya publik ditemukan.
Shika shinryo hojo
Buppōsō ; Ruten
Dechuan Jiakang di cheng gong mi ji
Shōzōmatsu wasan kōwa ; Gense riyaku wasan kōwa
Fuji Yukio tantei shōsetsusen
Anthony Caro
Kōkō chiryōgaku, shizui no hozonryōhō narabini shizui no jokyoryōhō
Rekidai shigaku seisen
José de Guimarães
Liao shi shi yi bu
Selected masterpieces of Japanese fine art from Tokyo Fuji Art Museum Collection
東京富士美術館蔵日本美術名寶
Catalog of the special exhibition of Japanese art treasures drawn from the Tokyo Fuji Art Museum collection held at the Art Gallery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. A total of 85 items, dating from the second half of the 16th century to the second half of the 19th century - also known as Momoyama and Edo periods - are featured in this volume. Included in this selection are screen paintings, paintings and calligraphy, ukiyo-e prints, ceramics, lacquerwares, masks and arms, which combine to present a comprehensive array of the achievements of the Japanese artists.
장난꾸러기 꼬마 마녀의 대모험. 1
Chūgoku keizai no genjō to tenbō
미스터 시이나의 정령일기 4
미스터 시이나의 정령일기 1
프라이빗 짐나스틱스 4
Ethical Policy Analysis in an Age of Risk, Uncertainty, and Futurity [microform]
Once dominated by approaches based on positivist assumptions, the field of policy analysis has diversified in recent times. Policy analysis now includes numerous perspectives on the processes of policy formulation, implementation, and evaluation. Many of these approaches derive from self-consciously defined schools of ethics. This dissertation surveys three generalized approaches to ethical policy analysis and evaluates them in light of moral dilemmas arising in the case of nuclear waste management policy in Canada. Its central argument is that an adequate approach to ethical policy analysis contains the philosophical tools necessary to address the moral problems of defining risk and understanding safety, identifying obligations to both existing and future generations, and conceptualizing legitimacy-conferring policy processes. Neither welfare utilitarianism nor modern deontology is sufficiently equipped, each containing philosophical elements of the good that beg further determination in actual policy contexts. Only the deliberative/discursive approach contains convincing conceptions of justice and the good, as well as a convincing conception of legitimacy, that provide for the justifiable resolution of debates about the moral foundations of public policy. Responding to challenges in the case of nuclear waste management in ways more comprehensive and more justifiable than both utilitarianism and deontology, discursive policy analysis promises to be an effective approach in other cases associated with risk, uncertainty, and futurity.